One caller, two approvers: the bypass a reader found in my approval code
The last piece ended with a correction. On the HTTP path of aine-control-plane, the field I had described as coming from the authentication layer came from an X-AINE-Actor header that nothing verifies. I opened issue #8 with a plan: first label where each actor value came from, then count the rows where the labels disagree. On 2 October a reader, @_firelinks, replied under that post and asked me to change the order. Their comment pointed out that the same header does more than decide whose name
🎯 Vulnerability: Web Security Vulnerability
💡 Defense Fix: Implement strict input validation, contextual output encoding, and enforce least-privilege authorization controls.